← Part of the Feedback Flows toolkit
AI marking for presentations, performances and practicals
Upload a presentation, performance or oral assessment. Feedback Flows transcribes speech, samples key frames for visual evidence, and drafts rubric-aligned feedback you can edit before release.
- Transcript plus visual evidence
- Rubric-aligned criteria table
- Timestamped quotes
- Teacher sign-off before publish
Oral and practical evidence without starting from a blank mark sheet
Presentations, EPA-style practicals and spoken assessments are hard to mark consistently. Rewatching recordings and writing criteria comments by hand eats evenings, and two assessors often notice different moments in the same talk.
AI marking for presentations analyses audio and video together: a timestamped transcript, sampled frames for visual criteria such as slides or demonstration quality, and a criteria table with Met / Partially Met / Not Met judgments, quotes and suggestions.
Timestamped quotes turn oral feedback into something you can defend in moderation. Visual frame sampling helps when criteria mention slides, demos or practical technique. Keep recordings within stated length and size limits, and export reviewed criteria tables into learner packs when EPA sampling needs a paper trail.
Agree visual versus spoken criteria before you upload. Assessors then know whether slide design, demonstration quality or oral content drives each band, which keeps AI marking for presentations consistent across a team.
Where AI marking for presentations fits
Secondary schools
Assess spoken language, drama and presentation homework with consistent criteria and timestamps. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI marking for presentations, then agree override norms.
Further education
Mark vocational presentations and practical demos without rewriting the mark sheet each time. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI marking for presentations, then agree override norms.
Independent training providers
Capture EPA-style oral and practical evidence with quotes assessors can sample. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI marking for presentations, then agree override norms.
Higher education
Support seminar presentations and oral assessments with rubric tables staff can edit. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI marking for presentations, then agree override norms.
Year 12 history presentation — 12 recorded talks
By hand vs with video and audio marking
| Aspect | Manual | With Feedback Flows |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence capture | Pause, rewind and scribble timestamps by hand when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin | Timestamped transcript and sampled frames in one view with teacher review and an export trail before release |
| Criteria coverage | Easy to miss a criterion under time pressure when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin | Full criteria table drafted against your rubric with teacher review and an export trail before release |
| Consistency | Assessor notes vary in depth and language when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin | Shared rubric language with editable justifications with teacher review and an export trail before release |
| Records | Scattered mark sheets and email comments when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin | Exportable feedback tied to the learner profile with teacher review and an export trail before release |
From recording to reviewed feedback
Upload video or audio
MP4, MOV, MP3 and similar formats. Set presentation type and education level. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.
Add criteria
Enter criteria one per line or load a saved rubric, including visual criteria when needed. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.
Analyse
Speech is transcribed; key frames are sampled; the AI drafts the criteria table. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.
Review
Edit justifications, delivery notes and suggestions, then save to the learner record. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.
What video and audio marking covers
Timestamped transcript
Jump to the moment a comment refers to. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
Visual timeline
Sampled frames support criteria about slides, demos and presence. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
Rubric table
Same Met / Partially Met / Not Met structure as the Smart Essay Marker. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
Delivery notes
Pace, clarity and presentation signals alongside content criteria. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
EPA-style evidence
Useful for portfolio and practical assessments in training providers. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
Export
Download reviewed feedback for records and moderation. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI marking for presentations.
Everything in one review screen
Transcript, visual cues and rubric judgments sit together so assessors can verify before signing off. Training Centre walkthroughs mirror the same AI marking for presentations screens so new markers practise review before live work.
- Quoted speech linked to criteria
- Visual evidence noted where relevant
- Editable before anything is shared
Research and practice
Continue exploring
Questions about AI marking for presentations
Try Video and audio marking on a live demo
Explore the tool with sample work, or start free with welcome credits on your own account.