Your rubrics
Import or build module criteria, band descriptors and vocational frameworks. Drafts follow what you teach, not a generic chat prompt.
For universities and colleges
Mark modules against your rubrics, build integrity evidence a tutor can stand behind, and keep clear answers ready for your DPO and procurement team.
Marking
Bring your own criteria. Draft at scale. Keep academic judgement where it belongs.
Import or build module criteria, band descriptors and vocational frameworks. Drafts follow what you teach, not a generic chat prompt.
Upload a class set or ZIP per learner. Mark in the background while you teach, then review before release.
Share samples, export for moderation and keep a clear trail of edits before a mark goes out.
AI drafts marks and feedback. A tutor or assessor reviews, adjusts and confirms. Nothing publishes without a person.
Integrity as evidence
Integrity checks sit beside the mark and show their working. A person records what happened next.
Compares new work with the learner’s own past writing, not a generic average.
Adjusts for writer context and only highlights passages it can quote back exactly.
Checks citations against Crossref and the claim the learner actually made.
A tutor notes the conversation and decision. The learner profile builds evidence over time.
Data governance
Purpose-limited processing. No training or building of AI on learner work. Our AI provider does not train on API content. Published retention, a live sub-processor list, and export or delete at any time.
Procurement
A Data Processing Agreement for schools, colleges, universities and training providers.
ICO registration, privacy policy, retention summary and enterprise controls on request.
Published and kept in sync with our legal pages, including where AI processing happens.
Role-based access for your team, with an audit trail of who reviewed and signed off.
Try it on a real module
No pressure quote. A short walkthrough, then a trial on work your tutors already mark.