← Part of the Feedback Flows toolkit

AI feedback tutor

AI writing tutor for formative draft coaching

Paste or upload a draft and choose a persona. The AI Feedback Tutor returns structured comments with topics, suggestions and quoted text — ideal mid-unit, before a final submission. Built for UK schools, FE colleges and training providers that want AI writing tutor with human review, clear exports and evidence trails that fit existing quality processes.

  • Rubric-aware or general modes
  • Encouraging, direct or Socratic tone
  • Quoted suggestions
  • You keep summative marks separate
AI feedback tutor guiding a learner through a draft
Structured formative comments with quotes
Why it matters

Help learners improve the draft, not just receive a grade

Summative tools grade final work. An AI writing tutor is for the messy middle: drafts that need clear next steps without a teacher rewriting the whole piece by hand or handing over model answers.

Select a rubric to keep feedback aligned to objectives, or run general writing feedback. Personas change tone — encouraging for confidence, direct for clarity, Socratic for deeper thinking — while you still decide what to share.

Choose persona deliberately: encouraging for reluctant writers, direct for clarity, Socratic for thinking questions. Keep summative grades in Rubric or Essay Marking. Quoted suggestions help learners find the exact sentence to improve; mediate before sharing with younger or vulnerable learners.

Share three coaching points in a lesson rather than dumping the full list. An AI writing tutor works best when a teacher curates the highest-leverage suggestions and models how to act on them. Write a one-page local policy for AI writing tutor: which assessments qualify, who reviews drafts, how long files are retained, and how learners receive feedback. Clear policy keeps staff confident and makes procurement or inspection conversations easier.

Who uses it

Where AI writing tutor fits

Secondary schools

Coach mid-unit drafts before controlled assessment windows without rewriting essays for every learner. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI writing tutor, then agree override norms.

Further education

Give consistent formative language across large vocational writing groups. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI writing tutor, then agree override norms.

Independent training providers

Support portfolio narrative drafts with Socratic prompts before assessor review. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI writing tutor, then agree override norms.

Higher education

Offer scalable draft coaching seminars can build on in office hours. Review a sample of outputs together the first time you introduce AI writing tutor, then agree override norms.

Worked example

A-level sociology — theory essay first draft

A learner pastes a 1,200-word draft. The teacher selects the department AO rubric and the Socratic persona. The AI writing tutor returns points on evaluation and evidence, each with a quote. The teacher trims two points, shares the rest in the next lesson, and keeps summative Rubric Marking for the final submission. Afterwards they note scheme or template tweaks so the next run needs fewer overrides, and they file exports with the usual AI writing tutor moderation pack.
Compared

By hand vs with ai tutor

Aspect Manual With Feedback Flows
Speed on drafts Full handwritten commentary per script when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin Structured coaching points ready to mediate with teacher review and an export trail before release
Tone control Varies with marker energy and time when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin Choose encouraging, direct or Socratic up front with teacher review and an export trail before release
Objective focus Comments can wander from the brief when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin Optional rubric-aware mode with teacher review and an export trail before release
Role vs grades Formative and summative often blurred when deadlines are tight and staffing is thin Kept separate from Rubric/Essay Marking with teacher review and an export trail before release
How it works

Draft in, guidance out

Provide the draft

Paste text or upload a file. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.

Choose mode

Saved rubric or general writing feedback. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.

Pick a persona

Encouraging, Direct & Concise, or Socratic Inquirer. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.

Review points

Each point includes a topic, comment, suggestion and quote. Check names and classes carefully so history lands on the right learner.

Capabilities

What the AI tutor covers

Formative focus

Improvement guidance rather than a final grade. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

Rubric alignment

Optional criteria so comments track your objectives. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

Personas

Match tone to the learner and the moment. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

Quoted evidence

Suggestions point at the learner's own sentences. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

Teacher mediation

Use as a coach for students or as a first pass for you to edit. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

Complements marking

Keep summative Rubric or Essay Marking for finals. Designed to sit beside your other Feedback Flows tools for AI writing tutor.

On screen

Clear, actionable draft feedback

Structured points make it easy to turn AI suggestions into a short coaching conversation. Training Centre walkthroughs mirror the same AI writing tutor screens so new markers practise review before live work. Leaders can sample completed jobs monthly to confirm overrides stay proportionate and comments stay in the department voice.

  • Topic and suggestion on every point
  • Quotes from the draft for grounding
  • Tone you can choose up front
FAQ

Questions about AI writing tutor

It returns structured formative comments — topic, suggestion and quote — on a draft, with optional rubric alignment and selectable personas. Most departments keep a short note on who may release AI writing tutor results and how parents are informed.

It is designed to coach with suggestions and questions. You still control what learners see. Export packs usually sit alongside your normal moderation or IQA evidence for AI writing tutor.

Yes. Select a saved rubric so feedback targets your learning objectives. New staff can learn AI writing tutor via Training Centre lessons and the guides linked on this page.

Use Interactive Feedback when you want inline highlights on the document itself. Use the Tutor for a structured list of coaching points. Always leave a trained person in the loop before learners see AI writing tutor outcomes.

No. Use Rubric or Essay Marking for final grades. If you are unsure whether AI writing tutor fits, compare the related tools listed below and pick by assessment type.

Teachers running draft check-ins, and departments that want consistent formative language. Credit use and retention follow your Feedback Flows account settings when you run AI writing tutor.

Encouraging, Direct & Concise, and Socratic Inquirer — choose the tone before you generate. Sample a handful of outputs in the first week so team norms for AI writing tutor stay consistent.

Yes. Paste a draft or upload a file depending on how the work was submitted. Keep policy language plain: what AI writing tutor drafts, what humans decide, and what is stored.

No. Treat output as a first pass you mediate, especially for younger or vulnerable learners. Escalate only with evidence — quotes, pairs or reports — never with a score alone from AI writing tutor.
Get started

Try AI tutor on a live demo

Explore the tool with sample work, or start free with welcome credits on your own account.