AI marking software for schools and training providers
One platform for rubric marking, handwritten mocks, integrity checks and evidence. Upload work, apply your criteria, review every draft, then publish with professional judgement intact.
- Rubric-aligned drafts
- Teacher review before publish
- Batch cohort marking
- ICO registered · UK-built
What AI marking covers on Feedback Flows
AI marking drafts grades and feedback against criteria you supply: a multi-band rubric, a board mark scheme, or vocational descriptors. The AI reads essays, structured answers, scanned handwriting and portfolio evidence, then returns a draft for educator review. Nothing reaches a learner until a person confirms it.
A typical run looks like this: a Year 10 English teacher uploads 28 coursework essays and the department’s shared rubric. AI drafts a band per criterion with quoted evidence. The teacher changes two borderline Merit/Distinction calls, softens one comment, then releases the set. The same workflow covers provider KSB evidence and mock exam scripts once you pick the matching tool.
Supported inputs include PDF, Word, text, ordered scan images and cohort ZIPs. Limits: poor scans, ambiguous criteria and low-confidence OCR always need a human look; regulated high-stakes awards stay under your centre policy. Schools: AI marking for UK schools. Providers: training providers. Detail: rubric marking and handwritten exam marking.
How AI marking works in Feedback Flows
Built around teacher control and moderation-friendly evidence.
Upload
Single scripts or whole cohort batches (PDF, Word, and common formats).
Apply your rubric
Use the rubric builder or import criteria your department already trusts.
AI drafts marks
Criterion-level comments reference specific strengths and gaps in the work.
You review
Adjust borderline grades, tone, and moderation samples before release.
Publish & follow up
Export feedback, generate targeted worksheets, and track progress.
See the full toolkit on our platform features page, or explore AI essay marking and rubric marking software.
Rubric-aligned results you can edit
Criterion-level feedback references the student’s work against your descriptors, editable before anyone sees a grade.
- Band and score drafts per criterion
- Personalised comments, not boilerplate
- Exports ready for internal moderation
Rubric-aligned AI marking with criterion-level feedback, editable before students see results.
Manual vs generic AI vs rubric-based AI marking
| Approach | Speed | Consistency | Rubric alignment | Teacher control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual marking | Slow at scale | Varies by marker fatigue | High when done well | Full |
| Generic AI graders | Fast | High but shallow | Low: often ignores your scheme | Limited |
| Feedback Flows AI marking | Fast first pass | High against your rubric | High: criteria you define | Full review before publish |
Read our comparison article: AI marking vs manual marking.
Who uses AI marking on Feedback Flows
Teachers
Cut mock-season and coursework spikes without generic comments.
For teachers →AI feedback for teachers →
Students and classes →
Schools and colleges: see AI marking for UK schools for GCSE, A-Level, ICO and DPA guidance.
Frequently asked questions about AI marking
More on privacy and school rollout: AI marking for UK schools · Safe & responsible AI in classrooms
Try AI marking free
Explore the live demo or create an account with welcome credits. No credit card required.